Comments on: Vote against new Flash Player security measures! http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/ Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:37:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: localToGlobal » Blog Archive » news review -> 47th week of 2008 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-543 localToGlobal » Blog Archive » news review -> 47th week of 2008 Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:07:35 +0000 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/?p=85#comment-543 [...] > Flexperiments » Vote against new Flash Player security measures! [...] [...] > Flexperiments » Vote against new Flash Player security measures! [...]

]]> By: Ids http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-505 Ids Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:41:36 +0000 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/?p=85#comment-505 And a click prevents that? (Because any mouseclick will do). Besides, you could use navigateToUrl for that, or any httpService, or remoting... or did they block that too? And a click prevents that? (Because any mouseclick will do). Besides, you could use navigateToUrl for that, or any httpService, or remoting… or did they block that too?

]]> By: mattjpoole http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-502 mattjpoole Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:55:30 +0000 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/?p=85#comment-502 allowing uploads without user input could be a means of a mallicious script "stealing" personal information (for example). It sucks, but imo its a necessity. allowing uploads without user input could be a means of a mallicious script “stealing” personal information (for example).

It sucks, but imo its a necessity.

]]> By: Ids http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-500 Ids Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:27:52 +0000 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/?p=85#comment-500 Well, of course it's good that Adobe fixes security breaches. But unfortunately, this video does not explain why uploading is restricted (Of course, it could be that the breach is in the upload mechanism, in that case: well done Adobe :-P). Like I said, I can totally understand that you need user interaction for <b>downloading</b> stuff, but not for uploading... Well, of course it’s good that Adobe fixes security breaches. But unfortunately, this video does not explain why uploading is restricted (Of course, it could be that the breach is in the upload mechanism, in that case: well done Adobe :-P ).

Like I said, I can totally understand that you need user interaction for downloading stuff, but not for uploading…

]]> By: doug http://labs.flexperiments.nl/vote-against-new-flash-player-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-499 doug Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:12:24 +0000 http://labs.flexperiments.nl/?p=85#comment-499 seen this yet? http://deceptiveresolution.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/adobe-didnt-make-much-noise-about-this/ might help explain some of the new restrictions :) seen this yet?

http://deceptiveresolution.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/adobe-didnt-make-much-noise-about-this/

might help explain some of the new restrictions :)

]]>